Dominique
Dominique
We implemented `jac_structure()` for ADNLPModels because we sometimes pass them to sparse solvers (which is admittedly inefficient). But in your case, I still don't see where the overhead is. If...
> we replace the docstrings by links to the reference page.
Is this still in the cards?
I'm also very interested in building upon Tulip's presolve but I don't use MOI. It would be great to simply pass an LP or QP in "matrix form" and receive...
Same issue. No conflict detected. Git is aware of them because I'm in the middle of a rebase.
You can't do that (at least not in the current state of things). Maybe we could cook up `jac_op!(J, nlp, x)`.
Is it? That wouldn't really be a desirable side effect.
In-place operators are not supported at this time, but they would be a welcome addition. Again, I would recommend creating a special type `InPlaceOperator
> If L is an arbitrary linear operator, the condition Matrix(L)’ = Matrix(L’) must always be fulfilled? Yes it should be. If you find a counterexample, please open a new...
LDLFactorizations solves in place. I didn’t really understand Tim’s response.