Pavle
Pavle
> If we want to support both `.rules` and `.yml` as proposed by this PR then both should be listed in the docs and argument specs. > > But if...
> > We probably want to keep the `*.rules` handling, at least from a configuration loading perspective, around in order to maintain backwards compatibility. Otherwise existing deployments that are pushing...
> @dpavle any chance you could refactor this so that we can get it merged? sure, I'll take a look at it