doubiliu

Agree, this can simplify the function of the node.But connecting remote nodes may need to consider some security issues。

I think such a function may be dangerous to governance, because some nodes may eliminate the governors who rely on real holdings of neo through some low-cost method.

I even have a more radical idea. We should ban voting through contracts in core.

In my understanding,'one person, one vote' is the ideal situation described by Satoshi , which is also the direction that various chains are working hard. But from a realistic point...

How do you prove that the delegated person is trustworthy, just because we have generated a whitelist? Now I don’t know whether the selected people are trustworthy, but I know...

One possible reason is that for more important issues such as the governance or economic model, we should be more cautious and take into account the interests of multiple parties....

Of course I’m just a proposal, it’s always good to discuss issues in many ways.

Yes.'one coin, one vote'. Clerical error :)

I very much agree with this idea of equality, so I added another idea. We directly build a fair platform, and it is of a public welfare nature, and cannot...

After deeply discussion with @vang1ong7ang , I was persuaded. I believe it is a good thing to have such a contract to complete aggregate governance. And 'neoburger' may be a...