David Osumi-Sutherland

> it becomes more of an exercise in "changing the metadata so that it sounds like the scope is unique". Or to reflect the true specificity of the scope when...

Reassigning to @bvarner-ebi as part of work on taxon slims. @bvarner-ebi - don't worry about doing anything until we discuss strategy.

> From tech group meeting: we won't act on this ticket yet because we need to figure out how to implement the GAP filling over existential (Anita's comment edited by...

If you just mean 'cell -> anatomical entity' - I think the link is through CARO. CARO was always meant to knit all these together. IN the absence of sufficient...

> Would be great to have those mature, widely used ontologies reviewed. > Any reason not to submit them for review ? Numbers of ontologies and speed of review means...

It looks to me like a star system doesn't get around the controversies - in the version proposed in #1217 it privileges manual review just as the current page does....

Why do we even have this term? Super confusing. Anyone using it in annotation will expect the child terms Bradley added.

@bvarner-ebi can you confirm fixed?

Strongly agree with the aims here. +100 to annotation at the axiom level for axioms that contravene principle 1 (O MUST NOT make any direct axioms about C). It is...

How about: When importing a class C from an external ontology O, it can be tempting to inject direct logical or annotation axioms about C that restrict or otherwise change...