doorstop icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
doorstop copied to clipboard

Requirements management using version control.

Results 128 doorstop issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

@theovoss @robertberrington How about: ``` bash $ doorstop trace LLR123 LLT123: child_links: - LLT001 - LLT002 parent_links: - HLR001 - HLR002 $ doorstop trace LLR LLR001: child_links: - LLT001 -...

feature

This is a common Requirements Standards item. DO-178 requires this, I'm pretty sure. ##

feature
help wanted

The HTML view of the documents doesn't provide a visual indication of "version". Would it be possible to allow an option to be passed to `doorstop publish` to print that...

feature
cli

After manually adding an item, I can edit the text. The `reviewed` value is `null` since I haven't made an initial pass in `doorstop` where `reviewed` is initially trusted. (`doorstop`...

feature
cli

For a document ABC that has the following item order: ``` initial: 1.0 outline: - ABC001: # Overview - ABC002: # Terms and definitions - ABC003: # This is a...

bug
help wanted

It can be useful to use the -j option to point to some folder within a (large) repo to speed up doorstop, but vcs operations fail in this case as...

bug
help wanted

Following the suggestion in #166 to [pipe published output to pandoc](https://github.com/jacebrowning/doorstop/issues/166#issuecomment-59281979), I'm using the command: `doorstop publish --markdown --no-levels body PREFIX | pandoc -t docx -o PREFIX.docx` But doorstop includes...

bug
help wanted

It appears the sidebar menu that is present in HTML export can display over top of content. In my document the first heading is long. When the page is scrolled...

bug
help wanted

Steps: * Edit the requirement set in Excel, using the `active` column to invalidate requirements, e.g. REQ999 * Publish the whole requirements with `doorstop publish all build/requirements` * This warning...

bug
help wanted

This is the issue is related to the previous issue #400. The background for the following proposal can be found there. > 1.1) Weak subpoint here: have you ever considered...

discussion