Donald Raab

Hi @fipro78, spending some time trying to understand the details and implications of this PR. A few competing goals we are trying to manage in the project in some sort...

> There is a mechanism that Woodstox (uses 6.4.0) uses for identifying the dependency as "provided" and "optional" which impacts the display in mvnrepository. @motlin @nikhilnanivadekar @prathasirisha @mohrezaei > >...

> I don't remember the PR very well anymore but in #1175 @donraab you went through some effort to create META-INF/services without adding a dependency on auto-service. I can't unring...

Hi @pranukrish, done!

Hi @pranukrish, yes adding a new method to `RichIterable` can be very complicated and involve a lot of changes. There is an approach which can split the total amount of...

@hendhamdi Thank you for submitting this PR. Apologies for the delay in reviewing, I have been focused on writing a book about Eclipse Collections which was released a couple of...

I was able to cause the stack overflow issue with 100K element IntList that is in order. ``` @Test public void bigIntArrayList() { MutableIntList list = IntInterval.oneTo(100_000).toList(); // list.shuffleThis(); list.sortThis(new...

> Just use `Arrays.sort()` `Arrays.sort()` does not accept a `Comparator` equivalent for primitive types.

Hi @bmarcaur, thank you for the question. I just answered a similar question on another issue. Since you have a specific need, you've answered my question from the other issue....

Yes, there would be asymmetry. Let me take a fresh look and see if I can come up with a solution that only uses `toArray`. > Wouldn't this be an...