Donald Sharp

I'm seeing memory leaks when I run the new tests with --valgrind-memleaks: ==63389== 704 (344 direct, 360 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 26 of...

this doesn't even run successfully?

This *must* be tested against ospf unnumbered peers as well as pim unnumbered as well. As that this changes behavior here.

In ospf I expect it to peer and work directly over /32 based network setups. On A setup say 192.168.161.5/32 on a interface and on B that it is connected...

@rzalamena can you take a look here? It sure looks like later code does work to ensure we do not read past the end of the packet later in the...

every place we call isvalid_labeled_nexthop we have already checked that the Path info has labels. So I am a bit confused how we shouldn't be checking for a valid labels.

if we have a prefix with pi->extra->num_labels set then the prefix should have that label. In this case we should not set the pi->extra->num_labels for the case you just described....

Perhaps you could fill out the information requested when you filed the issue?

Are you perchance running NetworkManager? If so please turn it off

something is going wrong where FRR is spending a very very long time in processing results( as evidenced by cpu run times of 70 seconds ). Can you get a...