Daniel Kraft

You can just set it in `namecoin.conf`. Or do you mean it should have some default value?

Since it passes with a wallet, I assume your guess is likely correct somehow. I can check it out at some point when I get time.

The issue actually is not that auxpow code requires the wallet, but just the auxpow regtest (for `getauxblock` and also e.g. to create a test transaction). So this is likely...

Free transactions won't work, as the fee is there to combat spam. Unless you are thinking of just making the minimum relay fee zero and still relying on an eventual...

Oh - I believe this should be moved to [meta](https://github.com/namecoin/meta) instead.

What usecase do you have in mind for this? If someone is running Namecoin Core, they would not need proofs at all anyway?

Looks like the auxpow you constructed is invalid. How exactly are you doing the merge-mining? (Note that I am not really an expert on mining and available tools, but I...

Sounds fine for me. (Note that you can of course already get the information, namely by combining `name_show` with `name_pending`. But I think there's no harm in extending `name_show` itself...

Once #328 is merged, the only thing remaining for this issue here is changing the default value of `-limitnamechains`.

This is indeed true. But as you point out, it would at least be non-trivial to change (although also not impossible). What would be the benefit? I think `name_scan` should...