Duncan N. Johnstone

@stefsmeets do you think this would still be useful, given #468 is now in?

Just a note that this is probably quite easy given: from skimage.transform import hough_circle, hough_circle_peaks

I don't know of anyone working on this - but the key people are @M0hsend and @matkraj who had both been looking at this part of the code. Would be...

@pc494 your opinion on whether we should track processing would be appreciated. In particular how we might associate "results" classes with underlying raw data.

A list of things that we might want under various headings: Instrument: - Type - Beam energy - Camera length Detector: - Type - Pixel size Processing: - Raw data...

> While I certainly agree we don't do a great job with metadata at the moment, I'm not that enthusiastic to track processing with it right now. That said I...

> So it falls into two main reasons, (1) a lot of the code still changes pretty rapidly, so if your method use was a couple of months ago it's...

This is going to be best addresses when XRD is also considered and will therefore be pushed to 0.11.0

Another assorted list of parameters we may wish to record: - radiation type (X-ray/electron) - beam energy - camera length - detector pixel size (real space units / reciprocal space...

@chrisallen80 and @M0hsend - we spoke offline about defining key metadata for scanning diffraction / 4D-STEM experiments. This would be a good place to write down any key parameters that...