Daniel Nilsson

Hi! Many, many thanks for a great library! On a similar note as for `gt_depths`, `gt_alt_freqs` seems defined `gt_alt_depths / (gt_alt_depths + gt_ref_depths)`. It turned out a pitfall for us...

Sorry, I missed the reply! Yes, we do have for RFC1 - but I kind of think you do as well, right? 😸 From the top of my head at...

Feel free to use the Stranger annotations! They include some genes that are not yet tested by Egor and co. However do know that the Illumina team do so much...

Hi @julesjacobsen! The use case is for a patient or geneticist to fill in data for a phenotype report to UDNI in a small app, which could then be passed...

Thank you, looks viable and nice enough! I think we will lean towards doing something like that. Just in case, do you think it would otherwise break other apps or...

Precisely! #162?

What went wrong then? Anything we can mitigate? Options? Keep code dependent on particular annotation programs and versions ranges, and implement different annotator conventions as needed in various places, while...

Ideally, annotation programs would reach a concensus on field names in INFO ANN/CSQ..

Iff the vcf has been indexed, the number of records would presumably be in the index.. ``` bcftools index -n hapmap_pos.vcf.gz 108 ```

👍🏻And the same variants in a vcf for the vcf adaptor part perhaps? > On 29 apr. 2016, at 09:36, Måns Magnusson [email protected] wrote: > > We should have a...