Dmitry Timofeev

> Did you consider, as a possible solution, the usage of generation-based (also known as versioned) pointers? This seems like a possible (and possibly efficient) solution to the issue. No,...

> Q0: Is it useful to all users? Given our experience in EJB; some feedback from people who got this wrong; and the feedback from our tutorial project, I think...

Hey, I support extending the list of maintainers, as, unfortunately, I can't dedicate time to this project in my current role. @stanislav-tkach , whilst only Josh can add people to...

Great, thanks! Then we need to 1. Find contributors who can and are willing to take these responsibilities. Depending on whether Stas can review CLs, we might need at least...

Some possible options (just brainstorming): - (1) Use JObject containing null pointer (as dd5f3a5ab9809aa1c3fa664161a7deb3ae457955 and #136 do) - (2) Return Err, as was intended, reverting previous changes - But is...

Thanks, I think there are at least two categories in which the underlying functions could be split up: 1. Returning `null` as a possible reference value (like `get_object_array_element`, `get_field_unchecked`). 2....

Related, though, rather dated PR adding some Java modules for Java ITs and benchmarks (but not Java modules for _Rust_ ITs): #129

Hi @argv-minus-one , I might be missing something, could you clarify please in which cases you need to dynamically link jvm instead of linking it at build time and loading...

I see. I think we have to figure out the following things: 1. The level of support — whether we support: - Only dynamic loading/static linking - Dynamic linking -...

That's a good idea! Unfortunately, I am not a graphic designer either :-) Reminds me of an ingenious sticker Dmitry Lagoda did for Exonum Java Binding: an owl in a...