Denny Lubitz

They simply removed the `__constructor` 🤷‍♂️ https://github.com/TYPO3/Fluid/compare/2.8.0...2.9.1#diff-2c7c7fa9107b49ca699c16aec70b902436177808789afabfbb5199daa5a629f0L58

Steps to reproduce: ``` composer update # with "typo3fluid/fluid": "2.8.0" ./flow flow:cache:flush --force ./flow flow:cache:warmup composer update # with "typo3fluid/fluid": "2.9.1" ./flow flow:cache:flush ``` To fix this you can run...

@vcg-development But something went wrong with your PR. It has 499 commits now. I guess it targets the wrong branch?

I think @kitsunet is right and we can't provide safely this global flag without potentially breaking dedicated help arguments of the commands.

Thank you @Baachi for this PR. But this fix might work, but isn't correct at this place. The `Neos.Form.Builder:SelectOptionCollection` is not aware of the items it get's passed. This needs...

Hi @samsauter, have you alreday checked the docs: https://github.com/neos/form-builder?tab=readme-ov-file#dynamic-options Instead of providing the property paths (`valuePropertyPath`, `labelPropertyPath`) you need to provide a itemRenderer. For example something like: ``` [email protected] =...

Tests have been added here: https://github.com/neos/neos-development-collection/pull/5384/files#diff-d86d8dcc7cb78398ebf7af3266b121067680af0ba66dde88dbefc3b6ce5d1012

Thank you @vcg-development for this PR. But from my POV it doesn't make any sense to introduce a new feature, which has already an EOL with the next major.

Ok, this might work for creation dates, but not for changed and published, right?

But why? Every external package could change the core behavior and you can't control that. If you want to test the core, you simply need to install the core.