Dave Longley
Dave Longley
@TallTed, Yes, sorry, that's what I meant (replacing the first "respectively" with the above suggestion) -- but, yes, a PR will make clear what the chosen text will be.
Yes, I've updated my comments to indicate that, thanks!
> "data integrity" secures an RDF graph ... When using a cryptosuite that uses RDFC. You could also use one that uses JCS -- or both at the same time...
Yes, and we need to mention that `verificationMethod` can be optional like the other properties *if* the cryptosuite provides another mechanism by which to obtain it. In short, it's really...
@Baha-sk, > The question I've always wondered is why X25519KeyAgreement prefix in particular? what about EC P-256, P-384 or P-521 types or the Bitcoin curve key (ES-256k1)? don't they deserve...
So, I'm in support of making sec-v3 work with suite contexts. However, I don't know, at this point, if sec-v3 is even useful/needed. Why not just use the feature-specific security...
> Do we need to keep sec-v3-unstable around to deal with all the security context stuff that /isn't/ in a cryptosuite? Like what? We've created separate contexts for WebKMS and...
Yes, prefixes generally cause trouble. They can be "ok" if appropriately scoped and well thought out, but that's asking too much of authors most of the time, so it's better...
> We need this for secure data stores.... Can you link to more information on this?