Dave Longley
Dave Longley
@OR13, > I'm a -1 to "developer contexts".... thats what community groups are for. I don't think this should be a "developer context", but rather one that clearly signals that...
@nadalin, > I'm against adding anything over and above JWT processing, so a big -1 to this approach I have to say that this doesn't make any sense to me....
@David-Chadwick, > The downside of this is that software will no longer be able to tell if unrecognised properties in a VC were meant to be in the VC or...
A reason to report back `uses` and not just fail verification if the number of `uses` > 1, is that the caller may be able to determine that their verification...
See the similar issue mentioned and discussion here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/vc-api/issues/291
An "expand all" button is highly desirable... otherwise I think it's ok.
I imagine the next step (5.1.2) may need to talk about setting `result` back to an initial active context instead of saying it's being initialized as well. I do think...
PROPOSAL: If `@prefix` is present in a term definition, and its value is a string, then the term may only be used as a prefix. Additionally, including `@id` in the...
@pchampin -- Does the above sound like what we meant on the call?
@rubensworks, > So this would mean that if `@id` and `@prefix`: true would be used, that the term can be used as both a prefix and a property, right? Yes....