Dirkjan Ochtman
Dirkjan Ochtman
> * We can eliminate the unreachable branch in `closest_encloser_proof()` by re-ordering the `Some((0, _))` and `Some((i, _)) if i > 0` branches. Took care of this in - #3208
Open to reviewing a PR for this.
I don't think this is well-known, it seems pretty surprising. Providing a ready-made reproducer would probably be useful.
What provider are you trying to use? Would you be able to submit a PR?
@ctz I think you were working in this direction, you had a branch somewhere right? I can't find an earlier issue in this report ATM...
> Exposing such a service would allow for combining hickory-dns servers with the rest of the tower ecosystem and taking advantage of e.g. the wide availability of middleware. Can you...
Okay, if you want to move the code in this direction I can probably review it. Make sure to make small atomic commits, though.
What does `flamegraph -V` say?
Would be nice, I guess. @cpu I guess this would make RFC 9539 support nicer but it's not a requirement? @Cyberax would you be able to contribute a PR that...
I've also been seeing some issues -- however, it seems to be inconsistent? In some VS Code workspaces it works, in others it doesn't. Current hypothesis: it only works in...