Diogo Ivo
Diogo Ivo
Hi all, I just realized that this PR existed. I like this sorting solution, so my question is should I update #28959 based on this approach?
Given that the final form of this feature is significantly different from my proposal I think it's better if @kukrimate takes over from here. I will provide testing with the...
Sorry, I thought I had pushed the latest version of the DT functions, the clang compile fails because the switch statement is missing braces around `case FDT_PROP: { ... }`...
Given that the majority of the features in this PR are agreed on and that only the SMBIOS related bits are hampering those features from being merged I would suggest...
I have been testing the latest update on the various Siemens IOT2050 platforms and found that in some cases the comparison skips over the first dtb in the UKI. More...
Yes, I am using the IOT2050 dtbs in the Linux kernel, so k3-am6528-iot2050-basic*.dts and k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced*.dts
Hi guys, any update on this? It would be great if this could move forward. If it's needed I can jump in and help with addressing the review comments @kukrimate.
Is there an advantage to keeping the same section name or would it be possible to name the extra sections .dtb-* as well?
For the use case that we are targeting it would be something around 5 dtbs, each around 50 to 80 kB
FWIW I agree with @bluca that keeping the same section name leads to a simpler design. I can implement this and update the pull request