Dinesh Annayya

Hi Timothy I have tried with latest OpenPDK : commit 6de165cc41b9f1050006d37288c8121c23756406 (*HEAD -> **master*, *tag: 1.0.205*, *origin/open_pdks-1.0*, *origin/master*, *origin/HEAD*) Author: Tim Edwards ***@***.***> Date: Sun Aug 8 20:45:43 2021 -0400...

@eder-matheus yes, in the latest version OPENROAD I see this as only [INFO] .. Question is what is the impact of this info ? Design wise I don't see any...

This is old ticket, PDN has this support now

Is this one ? set ::env(GLB_RT_OBS) " \ li1 150 130 833.1 546.54,\ met1 150 130 833.1 546.54,\ met2 150 130 833.1 546.54,\ met3 150 130 833.1 546.54,\ li1 950...

This digital_pll is hardmarco picked from caravel project. If caravel/efabless team able to integrate this macro why it's issue for my project ? In MPW-5 time I have integrated DFFRAM...

Here is working case with MPW-5 tool with same MPW-6 DEF and LEF included with digital_pll  Attached my MPW-5 PDN setup [riscduino_working_mpw5.tar.gz](https://github.com/The-OpenROAD-Project/OpenLane/files/8955598/riscduino_working_mpw5.tar.gz)

python3 ./env.py issue-survey Kernel: Linux v5.13.0-44-generic Distribution: ubuntu 20.04 Python: v3.8.10 (OK) Container Engine: docker v20.10.16 (OK) OpenLane Git Version: 0dc6fb79c91082b94f8ded78d70f8bacbab96bf2 pip: INSTALLED pip:venv: INSTALLED --- PDK Version Verification Status:...

If we see the power mesh inside the digital pll , Vertical => MET4 and Horizontal => MET5  There should not be any issue in Golbal Horizontal PDN Power...

If you see the current issue, PDN hook-up is missed for even macro with MET3/MET4 power mesh and I don't see any PDN error reporting during this case

@arlpetergadfort As i informed in mail thread, I am re-using this hardmarco available in Efabless/caravel project. As this block has some analog component, I will not be able to re-harden...