Karol Łacina
Karol Łacina
Oh, I see. In that case, the compiler error message has misled me…
Then I suppose this issue should be assigned the "error message" label or closed if duplicate?
Leaving this PR unmerged will leave the aforementioned bug (point 3) unfixed. I opened #61 for this, in case you have a different solution in mind. Note that making field...
> That can easily be handled on the query level (it's captured as both, with the field name simply having priority due to pattern order). Could you please provide a...
Thanks! In case anyone encounters the same problem, the full set of highlight queries to distinguish the two aforementioned cases is: ```scm (field name: (identifier) @field) (field "[" . name:...
> lambda parameters are now valid in contexts they previously weren't Do you mean the parentheses? I moved them out of the `parameters` node into `function_definition`/`function_definition_scope`. And a lambda parameter...