Axel Burri

Adding a reinterpret_cast should not break anything, I think this is fine as a workaround. I'm hesitating a bit to add this to the code, as this should not be...

@ghost any news on this? do you know of any upstream (IAR ARM) fixes in that regard?

I have implemented incremental raw deletion in the [delete-incremental-raw branch](https://github.com/digint/btrbk/commits/delete-incremental-raw): The scheduler will make sure that dependent parents are never deleted, and printed in the scheduler results as "preserve forced:...

> See my first post again. I am asking to run a command before snapshotting starts and run a command after it finishes. That's not the same as running a...

@frinnst you have hit a bug in btrfs-progs, see #519

I'm afraid I did not yet have much time to wrap my head around this. I'm hesitating a bit to implement too much special logic for incremental raw targets: -...

Merged delete-incremental-raw branch into master: 61691abbfc8fc1351908ce8a97d5e2908dc8d9b0 Leaving issue open until included in release.

Are you sure there's no `target_preserve_` rule restricting backups? Please check with `btrbk run -S -n". If the problem persists, please paste you /etc/btrbk/btrbk.conf and used version.

Oh, I stumbled onto this while working on some major refactoring a couple of months ago, and did not give it too much priority. I cherry-picked the fix in the...

sorry for the late reply, was super busy with other things lately... > storage.20220518T000000+0800 is in the backup summary, although I think it should be the first in the list...