Axel Burri
Axel Burri
(Sorry for the late answer, I kind of missed that one...) > But I suppose the system recopy all data for each runned archive command ? No, btrbk can still...
see [FAQ](/digint/btrbk/blob/v0.31.2/doc/FAQ.md#why-is-subvolume--configuration-not-recommended). This is asked a lot, and btrbk disallows it for the reasons described in the FAQ. Nevertheless there are some use cases where this could make sense, I'm...
I see two ways of implementing this: 1. Add a command to the pipe (between `btrfs send` and `btrfs receive`), measuring the "transferred size of btrfs-send". This might not really...
> I would think option 1 would be a reasonable estimate and not need much in the way of overhead. Yes, this is also valuable information. Especially when you want...
Sorry for the late reply, I kind of missed that one... I believe this is being addressed by "send stream v2": https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Design_notes_on_Send/Receive#Send_stream_v2_draft Not sure about how far the development has...
Setting `btrfs_commit_delete each` in your `btrbk.conf` should help. This will call `btrfs subvolume delete --commit-each` which should "wait for transaction commit after deleting each subvolume." (see btrfs-subvolume(8) ) (sorry for...
I've added a quick'n'dirty patch in the sync-after-delete branch: https://github.com/digint/btrbk/tree/sync-after-delete commit f78fd742e442491f5767b4c519f19dc8c4dc35dd It adds `btrfs_commit_delete sync` config option. Have not much tested it, should work. ``` btrbk run --override=btrfs_commit_delete=sync -v...
You can safely ignore this warning (it originally existed to alert me on upstream changes in output for `btrfs subvolume show`). A fix for that already exists on btrbk-0.29.0: -...
Since Wednesday 26 May 2021, **the channel `#btrbk` on freenode is not under my control any more**. As of now, the **official IRC channel for the btrbk project is on...
As long as you did not delete your `TO_BE_RESTORED_SNAPSHOT` and `folder.old`, the parent relations should not be broken and btrbk should still "find" the chain. The question is what you...