Diego Havenstein
Diego Havenstein
Hi Simon, yes, reading the proxy object regardless of the outcome of the branch could be expensive. In these cases I will not do anything, since I don't know the...
I have observed something similar with the delete target... see #556 Did you find a workaround for this?
> Though I approve of this change, I do think we're still leaving some things undefined that are worth specifying. > > Notably: what's the maximum individual/combined size of Tree...
> Is it worth introducing a new ServerLimits/ServerConstraints message that contains various different limits to be introduced in the future? That sounds like a good idea to keep CacheCapabilities stable,...
> Is it worth introducing a new ServerLimits/ServerConstraints message that contains various different limits to be introduced in the future? I had a look again, I don't think it's good...
> > > Are you referring to UpdateActionResult()/GetActionResult() in ActionCacheServer.java? > > > > > > Is that ActionCacheServer.java in bazel-buildfarm? If so... yes? > > GetActionResult() is only permitted...
@amishra-u if I work on https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/18449, I may grab this one as well
@coeuvre can you assign this one to me as well pls?