dd di cesare
dd di cesare
It looks good, maybe there's a pattern for crafting the mutators other than the suggested, we could put a pin and look into it later on too.
This is related to https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/issues/69, since right now the flow accepting Kuadrant services installed in a custom namespace is broken
This might not need to get rid of the random namespace generation, but to make the most of it and run test in parallel, since the integration ones are taking...
I'd say it is, since the RFC even if it's finished before the holidays, after reviewing and adjustments, it most probably will end up being implemented in March.
@eguzki @mikenairn I'd imagine for some testing during the review... would you reckon it's better to not build at all on PRs?
@Boomatang thanks for the review, I'll be changing some stuff since it needs to cover what's been defined in the [RFC](://github.com/Kuadrant/architecture/pull/114/) to be acceptable as part of the alpha api....