Dave Golombek

No, I don't use any `internal` blocks currently. I saw that issue, but it doesn't seem to match what I'm running into.

We're seeing this with 9.3.4.0 as we're trying to upgrade to the 9.3 series.

This sounds like the same issue I brought up in jruby/jruby#6326 -- when I downgraded to JRuby 9.2.6.0 it went away.

Any chance this could be revisited? [It look like Netty 4.1.64.Final supports Brotli](https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/10960), and there are MANY reasons to update the default version of Netty up to a more recent...

Actually, there's a bug in 0.1.5 that I found after pulling in directly. Will report that separately, but it should be fixed before releasing 0.1.5.

I'm seeing this too. I believe it's tied to how [HandlerPublisher.receiveCancel()](https://github.com/playframework/netty-reactive-streams/blob/main/netty-reactive-streams/src/main/java/com/typesafe/netty/HandlerPublisher.java#L329) sets subscriber to null without changing state. It feels like something in the cancel chain should set state to...

Ooops, looks like my stacktrace is slightly different, I'll file a different Issue and submit a patch for that one.

Yep, will do -- sorry about the poor bug report yesterday, I was rushing. I suspect this is a bad interaction between Faraday, Net::Http::Persistent, and jruby-openssl. This is a heavily...

I'm happy to submit a PR for this if we can come up with a design that you're happy with.

It could be -- it really depends upon what interface you want to expose, which is tied to how we mutate the existing interface. As I mentioned under alternative approaches,...