Deniss Alimovs

Cool, thanks. Looks very similar.

Just checking if there were any discussions around that. We are using `ember-basic-dropdown` inside an engine and because it relies on the [`contentFor` hook](https://github.com/cibernox/ember-basic-dropdown/blob/master/index.js#L25) it does not work. @cibernox @trentmwillis...

@amk221 the workaround that worked for us was to include the `` tags manually on the `tests/index.html` pointing to the engine bundle.

Aha, that's a very good question 👌 Turns out it is not 😢 https://github.com/system-ui/theme-ui/blob/master/packages/components/src/Link.js @TylerBarnes I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on how to go about theme-ui...

It would be great if you could share the code for describing your models. Then it would be possible to trace why your column is set to relation as oppose...

Yes, I am experiencing the same in `ember-power-select` as it uses this addon under the hood. Can't find `dropdown--transitioning-out` in the codebase at all also. Same problem in this example...

That sounds perfectly reasonable. In fact that is how we designed our addon. `ember-can` is simply a dependency of `ember-can-router-dsl`. Ok great, I'll ping you for some feedback when it's...

Any update on this?!

@offirgolan I had a play with your awesome code! And whipped up something that works https://github.com/offirgolan/ember-time-machine/pull/121 The new API is `timemachine.beginChanges()` and `timemachine.endChanges()` where you can make as many changes...

@offirgolan here's another approach where the `undoStack` is a collection of `changeSet`s which is essentially an array of `Record` changes. A bit more neat I think 😉 https://github.com/offirgolan/ember-time-machine/pull/122