Dennis Bautembach comments

Results 14 comments of


                                            Dennis Bautembach

Points visualization sizes does not reduce with version v2020.09 shipped with Debian Bullseye

Couldn't you just allow us to set an absolute point size, regardless of the bounding box size?

Cannot reduce the point size with meshlab 2020 after some degree

Bump. I work with large point clouds (~100M). The minimum point size (2) is still way to big for me. Would be nice if the slider went all the way...

Simplify code

Would be happy to do the refactoring if you think it's worthwhile..

[QUESTION] How can I overload the [ ] operator?

Is there an equivalent to make a class behave like a dictionary?

Build error on MacOS 12.2 and Clang 13.1

Adding `set_target_properties(matplot PROPERTIES CXX_STANDARD 17)` resolved the error.

M1 Mac Error: "UNSUPPORTED (log once): POSSIBLE ISSUE: unit 2 GLD_TEXTURE_INDEX_2D is unloadable and bound to sampler type (Float)"

Getting the same error with [imgui](https://github.com/ocornut/imgui) when trying to use `AddImage()`. Some report that the issue is caused by texture arrays and (float) indices. This doesn't apply here as Imgui...

M1 Mac Error: "UNSUPPORTED (log once): POSSIBLE ISSUE: unit 2 GLD_TEXTURE_INDEX_2D is unloadable and bound to sampler type (Float)"

For anybody who faces the same issue: The min/mag filter was defaulting to mipmap but the texture had no mipmaps attached. Explicotly seeting the filter to linear fixed it.

M1 Mac Error: "UNSUPPORTED (log once): POSSIBLE ISSUE: unit 2 GLD_TEXTURE_INDEX_2D is unloadable and bound to sampler type (Float)"

@soywiz sry mate, it wasn't an issue with ImGui but with my OpenGL code: ``` int id; glGenTextures(1, &id); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, id); glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, ...); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); // * glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER,...

<random>: uniform_real_distribution(a, b) produces outputs outside [a, b)

@fsb4000 Thanks for letting me know. So, currently, by definition we are forced to break the standard because it is inconsistent. We can either - Follow the dictated implementation, breaking...

EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL seems to have no effect

`DOWNLOAD_ONLY` is also ignored.