Denis Zykov

Added parameters passing to template in version 2.0.0. You could [download and update DLL](https://github.com/deniszykov/t4-templates-unity3d/raw/master/src/GameDevWare.TextTransform.Unity.2017/Assets/Editor/GameDevWare.TextTransform/GameDevWare.TextTransform.dll) or wait for Unity Asset update. [Here](https://github.com/deniszykov/t4-templates-unity3d/blob/master/src/GameDevWare.TextTransform.Unity.2017/Assets/Editor/Examples/Parameters_Example.tt) is example of template with parameters and code to...

There is multiple optional parameters in ```RunForTemplate``` now. I have added ```outputPath``` too.

Hi @llint. Unfortunately I can not add this feature. it will require rewriting every layer of serialization/de-serialization code because stream at lowest layer. - User API (you are interacting with...

> Currently to avoid blocking, I have to create a MemoryStream, asynchronously read (BeginRead/EndRead) from the NetworkStream, and copy the data into the MemoryStream object, and invoke. Yep, this is...

Hi @Mol0ko! This is must be `Dictionary` representation problem. Some serializers serialize them as arrays of `[key, value]` tuples, and some as arrays of `{ "key": xxx, "value": xxx }`...

He is problem, all your object are represented as tuples `[a,b,c,d]` instead of objects `{ a: x, b: x, c: x, d: x}`. You need to tune server-size serializer to...

@BinhNguyenPSA sorry I have no plans to expand this package. I gladly accept PR with new object serializer.

Hi @sadradelir, if you want to ignore some field during serialization you could: a) make them private|protected|internal b) remove DataContractAttribute from class and add IgnoreDataMemberAttribute on ignored fields c) add...

Do you mean storing only objects field values? At the moment there is no such feature. You can implement your own serializer of such objects and register it in SerializationContext.ObjectSerializerFactory....

Hi! You can hide Properties by making them **private** or marking with **IgnoreDataMember** attribute. As alternative you can refactor them as GetXXX methods,