Denis Maier
Denis Maier
If I remember correctly, 1.0.1 had affixes on `cs:label`. Why have we removed them?
But it is still only on label, not on place, right? Is that on purpose?
Not sure. On the other hand, do we need an attribute to specify state formatting rules? "Cambridge/MA" vs "Cambridge (MA)"
@bwiernik Can you please give a brief summary of your changes? And perhaps a couple of examples. It's been a while since we've discussed this.
Ok, this change does not affect the general behaviour here, or does it? It's only that there's now one element instead of multiple, correct? Anyway, it's hard for me to...
How is that different from reprint information? Or could that be handled with `original-` variables or the like? I'm just wondering whether there could be a more general mechanism to...
> At the moment I don’t even see a complete set of variables to which one could map these fields. There are `original-date` and `original-title` (semantically not a container title)...
I'd say `original` would be better. But we could also think about a `amended` object if that better fits this purpose. Perhaps there are other cases where such revisions are...
That's why I asked about reprints. If that's misleading, what about `revision`?
Sounds reasonable. Any reasons not to add this? If no, 1.0.2 or 1.1?