Denis Maier

How would you call a variable with the standard relationship? `related="item"`? E.g., if you have a macro with related="original", but one variable would refer to a variable from the item...

You are probably correct. Another thing I'm thinking of: if we indeed do this, we could change container- and volume- variables to relationships. Because most variables are called by macros...

> That would also make it clear what should happen when this appears: > `` > The general inheritance rules are that a lower-level specification overrides an inherited value from...

> Should be easy in schematron. Ok. At least. And what do you think about the overall issue?

> First thoughts (subject to change): > > * I don't see why we should allow `@related` on macro. > * I don't think we should allow `@related` on macro...

Sorry, I wasn't clear about the first use case. That was supposed to mean this: ``` ... ``` Later you call it with: `text macro="title" related="reviewed"/>` or `text macro="title" related="original"/>`

So @bdarcus @bwiernik what do you think? Should we add `@related` to macros and groups? Other opinions, @georgd @cormacrelf @fbennett @PaulStanley @jgm?

> Make `publisher` a name variable and add `place` attribute to the name variable schema. This will permit correct rendering of multiple publisher/publisher places. In addition, this PR adds a...

Maybe I've missed it, but I've only seen delimiters between names and between places. But how do you actually specify the colon between the place and the publisher? Simply an...

> @denismaier Yes, like with a label. I've tested with the 1.1 branch: ```xml ``` Jing complains about the suffix on `label`. "Attribute 'suffix' not allowed here." But that is:...