Denis Maier
Denis Maier
So, 9 years later. What should we do with this? Any new thoughts? (By the way, I suggest we add labels like "deferred" or "needs more discussion" for issues that...
Good question, I've been thinking about this as well recently. (I've been pondering whether we could be more lenient when adding new terms. As this doesn't seem to affect processors...
Can you confirm this @dittaeva ?
Does that sound reasonable @wrimle ? Should we make that change?
Ok, then I'd suggest we use @dittaeva's proposition. Regarding religious vs. neutral terms, we've added an option for this that will be available with an upcoming version: https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/pull/328
Pull requests opened: #266 and #267
So, @bwiernik @bdarcus. In light of #375 should we use option 1 here as well? With the new conditions syntax we should be flexible enough.
> The only thing that neither option currently has is an ability to test for a specific relation itself. We could skip that (e.g., instead testing for one of various...
Ok. It's now possible to test for related variables. (see the PR)
> So, `related-item="original"` tests for the presence of an original relation. Good. Technically, this tests true if there is any related variable? Or a certain number of them?