Richard L. Pyle

Also works as expected for me. Also on a PC using Chrome.

> doubtful...literature reports that do not cite specimens or cite specimens that cannot be located I would not automatically brand unvouchered reports of occurrences as "doubtful". I would guess that...

So... having thought about it a bit more, I think an alternate (and perhaps superior) approach to the "Taxon-at-Location" issue is to keep it as `Occurrence` (i.e., `Organinsm`-at-`Event`), but expand...

Thanks @nielsklazenga : > but I think the definition of Organism is already there: Yes., and that definition was crafted that way to leave the door open for including "populations"...

So... the distinction here is about what, exactly, is "doubtful". If we accept that an instance of `Occurrence` represents the intersection of an `Organism` and an `Event`, then the most...

> For me, this seems to be conflating data and annotations in the same term. I agree with @albenson-usgs here. I didn't articulate it well in my previous post, but...

> Occurrences do have a time component by definition; it is not brought by the Event. Darwin Core Events are actions by humans or machines and only coincide with Occurrences....

Hi @nielsklazenga : > I do not understand where you get these notions from. Well... I guess from many, many conversations at TDWG meetings and other gatherings and emails and...

> It was @deepreef himself who suggested we could use dwc:Occurrence for taxon distribution elements. I assume what you mean here is my assertion that we can capture information about...

@nielsklazenga : yes, that's what I mean by "my assertion that we can capture information about `Taxon`-at-`Location` in the context of `Organism`-at-`Event`" I think we're close to full agreement here...