Dean Kevorkian

@damieng could you please take a look at this only to tell if that is something you'd want? if so i'll submit a pr regarding this.

That is correct, but only correct to this point of time. Back on v2 of the LSP specs it wasn't as clear and explicit as it is now on the...

I agree. This is also what I stated in the beginning - current specs tell you should recontact the server with the chosen Command. But since there are already language...

@laughedelic there is no way at the moment for atom-ide-* package authors to support such behavior because the atom language client immediately calls exexuteCommand with the Command object received from...

I'm missing something, could you please clarify why we're required to use any of these? If I understand correctly, according to the [spec](https://github.com/Microsoft/language-server-protocol/blob/master/protocol.md#register-capability), the sending is done the same way...

So, for now we're only going to cancel requests via a `$/cancelRequest` request until we make a PR to vscode-jsonrpc or if Request/Notification types start receiving a `CancellationToken` object? I...

Yeah, it is a nice functionality but I was thinking (maybe at least for the Atom maintained ide packages) that they could be automatically downloaded & installed if the user...

@laughedelic I agree that's true for community packages. But maybe for packages that are maintained by the Atom team you'd want to offer the user to get the package instantly,...

@damieng Seems like current backend api (as documented [here](http://flight-manual.atom.io/atom-server-side-apis/sections/atom-package-server-api/)) doesn't allow searching more "advanced" queries (packages that must have an enhancedScope of source.cs, **and** atom-languageclient as a dependency). This will...

Maybe I'm wrong but I think you already support this SDK version according to [this](https://github.com/tylerszabo/RGB-Fusion-Tool/commit/2e8a1b735eadd8e7e59b6aa04abcb6ae0a3c57f5)