Daniel Cousens
Daniel Cousens
@runn1ng I commented on the commit directly. Nice work! Mostly nits. I think we're going to have 3 user-choices. * UTXO priority order * UTXO selection algorithm * Output selection...
Maybe also add an example of how BNB fits into this
I simply haven't had time to review/discuss this yet :frowning: - apologies @runn1ng
@karel-3d reading this again, I still don't know if this is the right space. Isn't the optimal behaviour around confirmations entirely contextually dependent? Many users may **always** want 6+ confirmations,...
Sorry for the delay here, reading now.
Looks good to me, at least for merge/ongoing research/testing :) - not for release until everything is tested though.
@runn1ng if the fee has no meaningful result, maybe `NaN`?
LGTM, will merge after nit then play with it locally
> should I do that in this PR or separately ignore for now, I'll find out post-merge
> I kinda like the idea of "waiting until there is enough balance", if not exactly how the other repo is doing it, since that simulates user's behavior more. Agreed,...