Duarte Cunha Leão

This feature is highly missed. At my company, we use the convention `Class.` to document constructors. This helps conveying the right information on the documentation, but is not recognized by...

Someone needs to maintain this library, it is great!

Also found this related older issue: https://github.com/jfairbank/redux-saga-test-plan/issues/134, from when @jp928 came to help @jfairbank as a maintainer.

Interestingly, it looks like the former is of a more recent version, `VERSION_NUMBER:"Release 2.13.1"`. This looks like a Safari bug (possibly a reincarnation of https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57600). See also the workaround in...

Follows from: https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-platform/pull/5210

The only safe solution, imo, is to extend the spec to have some form of tagged literals, as was proposed on the original discussion: https://github.com/json5/json5/issues/3#issuecomment-342050877. Besides, this solution would allow...

Honestly, I don't see the problem in a generic solution, such as: ```json { "customerId": "abcd", "orderDate": {"_": "date", "value": "2019-11-25T16:27"} } ``` ```js var parseClassMap = { "date": function...

@mindplay-dk, @prescod, @tracker1 the proposed, generic _inline type_ syntax is not a breaking change, imo, in the sense that taking advantage of it would require the explicit specification of a...

That's a pity. JSON5 is and will be a relaxed syntax version of JSON. It does not have or will have a standard mechanism by which an **externally** defined data...