David Buchmann
David Buchmann
@dawehner if you have too much time left after #97 this could be another cleanup. though much less important.
@dawehner sorry for the late reply. are you proposing a generic way of doing compiler passes for tags? compiler passes can do all kind of things, but for the standard...
feel free to ping me in the symfony/symfony issue to help with the discussion, btw.
you could also build that logic into the enhancer instances. having it in DynamicRouter makes things more complicated - but might gain some performance by not calling too many enhancers.
indeed with @crell we discussed the idea of having a generic "route enhancement" step somewhere that adds information to the chosen route based on whatever. and the drupal people where...
I would like to call this Route enhancer and allow any kind of coded logic that changes or adds to the route array. ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Lukas Kahwe...
we now have the generic RouteEnhancer - you could write one that is configured with a sub path to do what you need.
@lsmith77 do you have a specific use case for this? anyway i think it can be added when we actually need it somewhere, should not pose architectural problems, right?
do we want to keep this open? i think what could make sense is to have a way to configure a DynamicRouter at a sub-path, so having a prefix for...
very cool! i wonder if we should care about the xml and yml (and php) driver or just rely on the container configuration for those. in a separate config file...