David Boas

@Horschig I could go ahead and approve this. It looks okay to me. Can you just double check it and confirm you want me to proceed with this. We are...

We are fine not supporting before 2019b Thx From: Sreekanth kura ***@***.***> Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 2:14 PM To: BUNPC/Homer3 ***@***.***> Cc: Boas, David ***@***.***>, Comment ***@***.***> Subject:...

@samuelpowell I do hope we can make good progress when we meet in 10 days. It would be great to resolve this soon. I am also now hitting the same...

I modified the spec to indicate that required fields of measurementLists are `required if measurementLists is present` Sreekanth and I discussed the validator changes needed. He will work with Stephen...

@sreekanthkura7 , #151 has been merged. Can you remove the same fields from this PR as Sam requested in the comment above?

@sreekanthkura7 I just noticed that the table of contents needs to be updated to link to measurementLists and all the sub-fields

Should we discuss possible implementations for this offset in the spec here? It could simply be `data.dataOffset`. Or we can come up with something a bit more flexible that would...

@forihuelaespina can you make the change to the wordlist so that your pull request passes the spell check. This pull request is in limbo until you do that.

A solution thus seems to be to just clarify in the spec that a wavelength index is only needed for dataTypes for which a wavelength needs to be specified and...

Thanks for opening this @samuelpowell . I was thinking that it was appropriate to put this information in the `probe` object, perhaps creating `probe.multiplexing`. But from there, I am not...