Dave Berenbaum
Dave Berenbaum
> * **Features** page: Remove it? (check analytics) And/or merge with [Core features](https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/overview#core-features) from docs Returning to this point, in addition to the home page redesign, I would like to...
- [x] ... ideally we would dissolve the examples into the explanations themselves then, as suggested here. - [ ] Unrelated but should we rename this Custom Vega templates since...
@jorgeorpinel Do you think there's anything left to do here?
Great proposal! I have two questions: > * features: https://PRODUCT.com/features (heavy on graphics, low on text. High level intro to solutions) What is the goal of the features page? It's...
We can probably keep further discussion of the features and related technologies in separate tickets since there seems to be agreement that they don't belong in the readme, or at...
> * Features I think it should be something like workflows rather than features. We should be focusing on how users interact with the product.
> that... would be "Use cases" instead of "Features?" I was thinking somewhere in between. Since we are building modular tools, it should be possible to have a paragraph or...
Yup, sounds good. Thanks @jorgeorpinel @daavoo!
This hasn't seemed like it's caused much confusion. Closing.
This looks like a great addition to the user guide to me! A much more "holistic" look at pipelines than anything in the guide today. Thanks for taking this on...