Dylan Anthony

> Refs not supported: Do you know if there are plans to add support for references in request body? I'll look at ways to flatten this schema out without references...

@bolbken in order: 1. Sounds like a great feature, and you’re correct in your assessment of current behavior. 2. Yes! Though currently we’re rather slow to respond / review 😅....

Thanks for suggestion @kalzoo, I really appreciate you taking the time to think this through. Here are the concerns I have initially: 1. While this decreases _internal_ coupling to httpx,...

@erichulburd I'm absolutely on board with having users be able to provide their own templates for either partial or full override of the generated client. It was brought up before...

Interesting, I don’t think we’ve ever added (at least intentionally) support for multiple content types in one endpoint. How do you think this would be most ergonomic in the generated...

Glad you found a solution @dpursehouse! Would still love to add support for this some day, I'm sure there are others who would benefit from it.

I assume this is a limitation in `httpx` but it'd take some testing to be sure. Sending both a form and JSON is quite unusual. I'm guessing it just picks...

Hey @JamesHinshelwood, thanks for the contribution! I am wondering if maybe we should just expose the underlying `httpx.Response` object within our own `Response` class that comes back from the `_detailed`...

This is definitely an interesting concept—it basically makes the client stricter by enforcing that the server only returns the types that the spec says it will. I cannot count the...

I tested this with the latest code on main (roughly 0.7.0-rc.1) and it does _attempt_ to generate proper responses now using the same code it would for unions inside a...