David Wood

> I would appreciate if the RFC could list the syntax as an unresolved question: should there be some clear syntactic marker that the default bound is removed, or are...

Another summary comment! Here are the previous update summaries copied below so you don't need to uncollapse GitHub comments to find it: 2024-11-25 **Summary comment:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3729#issuecomment-2498703253 For those following along...

Since there seems to be consensus on it, I've adopted the alternative for replacing `ValueSized` with `MetaSized` and included this in the document. It just makes sense as it matches...

> I think `std::ptr::Pointee` should definitely be reused. I am not sure which alternative is, but it seems to me like the right thing to do is: > > *...

I've updated [the previous summary comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3729#issuecomment-2517204789) so it is still accurate.

I've pushed one small change with a reference to the now-upstream const traits RFC in #3762.

Another summary comment! Here are the previous update summaries copied below so you don't need to uncollapse GitHub comments to find it: 2024-11-25 **Summary comment:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3729#issuecomment-2498703253 For those following along...

Closing as there wasn't consensus on this idea and I don't have the inclination to keep pushing for a change here