David Omanovic

> Thanks for opening this. I verified that adding the `regularization` option reduces the time to compute the ansatz circuit. You show a change from 2m to 23s. I found...

Okay, so I have two separate runs, one without regularization, and one with regularization ($\lambda = 0.1$) @jlapeyre . This is for nitrogen in cc-pVDZ. It converges significantly faster with...

> > > > Okay, so I have two separate runs, one without regularization, and one with regularization ( λ = 0.1 ) [@jlapeyre](https://github.com/jlapeyre) . This is for nitrogen in...

> Since this is a tutorial, I think something like this is good: "to prevent overfitting, we introduce a regularization term with ...". That would be a minimal explanation, and...

> Sorry, I've changed my mind on this. For the tutorial, I don't think we should add regularization for now. The reason is that I have some numerical results (soon...

> > I do agree that regularization can hurt the SQD in some cases [@kevinsung](https://github.com/kevinsung) , but for N2 in cc-pVDZ I've found it to work with an arbitrarily chosen...