David Waltermire

Once usnistgov/metaschema#253 is merged, the CI/CD issues here will be fixed and this can be merged.

Some of this work has been addressed already, while some of this work, if desired, might require large-scale changes to the SP 800-53 content, which would be best done on...

@degenaro Agreed. We will work on these as soon as we can. I am slotting this for OSCAL 1.1 release, but I think we can complete this before the release....

We need to develop a short list of needed examples to provide to make this less open-ended/more achievable.

This work still needs to be done for SP 800-53 rev4. The SP 800-53 rev5 OSCAL content has improved bibliographic information already.

@netfl0 Do you have some specific suggestions about where we can work to align these efforts?

@Chris-Turner-NIST It would be good to propose a list of sectors to add. Can you come up with a list?

We need to consider how to support sequencing for weaknesses, actions, barriers, etc. It would be ideal to come up with a common pattern that could be used in all...

# Vulntology Sequencing Requirements ## Scope Support sequencing capability for: - Barriers - Weaknesses - Actions - Known Chains (possibly different case since we only want direct hops) ## Requirements...

We should take a look at [MITRE ATT&CK](https://attack.mitre.org/).