Dave Cramer

Well clearly it would need to be rebased. @jorsol are you able to work on this ?

> > Well clearly it would need to be rebased. @jorsol are you able to work on this ? > > Please note that currently, this will be a breaking...

JDBC doesn't support named parameters. I suspect that things like select * from foo where name like ':foo' might fail?

looks good to me. There are some format only changes that I would prefer to see removed

> Everything but org.postgresql.replication.ReplicationConnectionTest passes now. Don't worry about that one.

I'd like to see others review it as well. @vlsi ?

@bokken are you good with this now ?

Sorry I've been distracted. Do you have the link to where psql uses named parameters ? Looks like others have adopted the :name so if we go forward this seems...

I'm OK with this as long as we agree on the documentation. I have to read it again.

@kimjand give me some time to deal with some other things. For now I'm not against this, however my concern will be once we support this API then we are...