Diego Alejandro Tejada Arango

@g-moralesespana, the ramping constraints also must be modified to consider the accumulated investment (either simple or compact) in the constraints' RHS. Am I correct? **EDIT**: And the constraints for the...

@gnawin can an asset have a missing `investment_method`? Or must we guarantee in the input data that we always use either simple or compact? If we allow `investment_method==missing` what does...

@g-moralesespana and @gnawin, we need to add something for the investment in the flows; otherwise, the model could invest one year to get capacity, and the next one doesn't invest,...

> @datejada I agree that we should not allow investment method to be missing. And as @g-moralesespana mentioned, investment in flows should use the simple method. > > What I...

After discussion with the team, we need the following options: | investment_method | investable | investment variable | decommission variable | |-------------------|------------|---------------------|-----------------------| | none | TRUE | FALSE | FALSE...

@gnawin I suggest having this table (or similar) in the update of the documentation: https://github.com/TulipaEnergy/TulipaEnergyModel.jl/issues/462#issuecomment-2345997142

@gnawin With the proposed formulation, the concept of `initial_units` has changed since it depends on the year. As it is now, that parameter is actually representing the `existing_units` at that...

@gnawin since we are working with the accumulated units, then either the capacity should not depend on the year or if it depends on the year then it should be...

For the formulation and constraints look at issue #640

For the ENTSOE data base I found this, but I'm not sure if we have access (or if we could have)...it might be interesting to explore it... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7140005469414133760-f4XH/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop