Daniel Anderson

I like the general idea but this would be a massive change and I'm not sure it's worth it. A lot of the current codebase depends on the output from...

Sounds good to me. Thanks.

Okay, I appreciate it. I'm hoping to come back to work on some bugs and things here in the next couple weeks. I suppose we could use the GitHub version...

Thanks. Just to be clear, the **parameters** package handles the models that **broom** and **broom.mixed** handle, correct?

Thanks, I'll play around with this in a bit.

Yeah I'm definitely in favor of this as well, but I agree it would probably be more compelling if we had at least some basic lmer models covered. Maybe we...

That's interesting. I'm not familiar with that outlet at all. Is it peer-reviewed? Target audience looks to be K-12 teachers which is cool but not an audience I've really written...

Revisiting this. Above we talked about waiting until we had at least basic `lmer` support. Is that still the plan? Or should we try to submit to JOSS after our...

Hi both, revisiting this again. I think with v0.2 on CRAN now would be the time to submit to JOSS. We could wait until we implement the Bayesian stuff with...

Thanks - to be totally honest I never actually tested the branch that included `poly()` with `use_coefs = TRUE` so I'm not surprised to see some errors here. I appreciate...