Dan Bailey

> We discussed this in last week's TSC meeting. To summarize, I'm concurrently developing Python bindings for NanoVDB which expose GPU interop via nanobind, a feature which does not exist...

Though this is not currently a priority for the Steering Committee, we agree that this would be a worthwhile improvement. Note that we've recently adopted pybind11 as our python binding...

This PR should pass all the CI checks when #1775 and #1776 are merged in. @kmuseth - to follow up on one of your questions from the meeting yesterday. The...

Hi @gaida-exe, can you push an empty commit to this MR to trigger the CI to run again? Seems like it got stuck on one of the builds so we...

Should we close this PR and re-open using the feature branch as the source?

@apradhana @ghurstunither - I think this was merged prematurely, it doesn't appear to have a unit test or a changelog message? At the very least, it would need a couple...

> Whilst this looks good and the justification for the change makes sense, are we still trying to avoid introducing new methods to the tree? For example, wouldn't the advertised...

> @danrbailey, I implemented the updates since the last attempt (merge master->feature/fvdb and feature/fvdb->fvdb_ci_setup) but I'm still triggering all the other tests. I manually cancelled them. Perhaps it is the...

Merging to `feature/apache2` branch. Once the CI is passing, we will create a new MR to merge to master once again.

I think there's actually more to talk about here. The Tree and RootNode also make assumptions that the number of leaf nodes cannot exceed 2^32: https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openvdb/blob/master/openvdb/openvdb/tree/Tree.h#L116 The tree ones in...