Daniel Xu
Daniel Xu
For https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/2593, @llaoj has asked to be notified when the new repo is created
https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/2437 is a good candidate
https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/1903 is a good candidate
https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/1903 is good as well
New repo has been created: https://github.com/bpftrace/user-tools Please send PRs! I'll bump the existing PRs as well
Hi, xdp/tc/tcx support is an interesting idea. I see there was some old discussion in #319. However, I worry that this is outside bpftrace's core use case and it'll end...
Yeah sounds good to me. Maybe a hidden ``` #define true 1 #define false 0 ``` :rofl:
`-k` will report this: ``` dxu@fedora~ $ sudo BPFTRACE_MAP_KEYS_MAX=1 bpftrace -e 'BEGIN { @[1] = 1; @[2] = 2; exit() }' Attaching 1 probe... @[1]: 1 dxu@fedora~ $ sudo BPFTRACE_MAP_KEYS_MAX=1...
Additional error msg seems reasonable
I’m nervous about reaching into implementation defined behavior. I guess I have to wonder what the use case is. IIUC the majority use case of errno can be accomplished by...