Daniel Marjamäki
Daniel Marjamäki
@patrickdowling sorry for late reply. yes it would be good to get this fixed finally. I am not sure if there is corresponding tickets in cppcheck. I don't think so.
> I'm also wary of scope creep yes me too. And this has been open long enough already. I suggest you try to solve just a specific problem now and...
In a installed Cppcheck .. it sounds best to look in the FILESDIR first. I am not sure if it should even look in the executable path if the FILESDIR...
it seems redundant to say "Cppcheck cannot find all the include files" twice.. so does this fix that?
This code is undefined behavior. https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf page 152 If there are sequences of preprocessing tokens within the list of arguments that would otherwise act as preprocessing directives,150) the behavior is...
@parrotrueper I would hope you can consider to fix the evaluation code somehow then. And evaluate cppcheck using that. A user would fix the code and then recheck..
alright I guess we can reopen this. Fixing this doesn't mean we have to remove the error message...
I guess a simplecpp issue wouldn't hurt also
@firewave would you like that I release simplecpp now or do you have some more fixes..?
I feel that static_cast is even worse than const_cast though. const_cast is more strict.