Daniel Vu Dao
Daniel Vu Dao
Relates to https://github.com/github/scientist/issues/162. I'm happy to close if it's unnecessary! Thoughts: I found that making a class the default experiment a little aggressive and wondered if there was another way...
I'm wondering what the original inspiration for making any class that `include`s the module the default experiment, [code here](https://github.com/github/scientist/blob/303c1f4ff98786b702507ed0c4f8cfdeb5fc7138/lib/scientist/experiment.rb#L13). Is it possible to create a class that `include`s the `Scientist::Experiment`...
### Context A PR addressing this issue: https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape-entity/issues/368 The thing I am confused about is why we check if `object.respond_to?(:fetch, true)`. Implementing `#fetch` is tricky and I think that most...
### Context When delegating to a `FetchableObject`, we've seen that it can cause breaking changes since it's only checking `object.respond_to?(:fetch, true)` [here](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape-entity/blob/6eac458ddd69117ad979aaab7d1798bb1ba5a349/lib/grape_entity/delegator.rb#L18) as opposed to checking if the object is...