danespen

Never used tabs. Seemed to me having the code in a module was a good thing since it wasn't using storage if I didn't start it. If a built in...

Thomas Adam writes: > Hi @lgsobalvarro, > > Thanks for sending this in -- it's nice to see someone else other than myself > has thought about this. > >...

Thomas Adam writes: > Back when I started using Fvwm, I came from an TWM variant that used structures. I was happy to get away from that. > > @danespen...

Thomas Adam writes: > Hey @danespen, > > Note that the current Fvwm accepts commands from multiple sources at > the same time. Modules can send commands. They need to...

lgsobalvarro writes: > Yes. I have thought of this you mention @danespen. > > In fact I was asking myself: How could this I'm proposing work > for... let's say......

lgsobalvarro writes: > You are right. It would most likely deeply affect how FvwmCristal, > NoCDE and other similar styling utilities work. I just mention it as > an example...

Thomas Adam writes: > Leaving a few more thought here... > > I was looking at decors earlier and realised that they're both very > powerful and complex, yet utterly...

Thomas Adam writes: > Hi @danespen > > Yeah -- the decor syntax is really confusing. I've only ever had to > use it to change a few things, as...

lgsobalvarro writes: > I think what I'd like to see is a preprocessor approach to a new > syntax, similar (but not in implementation) to what FvwmPerl does > now....

Wyatt Ward writes: > For what I gather, and @ThomasAdam can correct me if I'm wrong, it > would be just one syntax the user would use. The other one...