Daira-Emma Hopwood
Daira-Emma Hopwood
On 04/10/13 13:06, zookoatleastauthoritycom wrote: > We need to add a link to this: > > http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114979/data-encryption-swiss-banking-will-be-expensive-and-overseas The article says that Tahoe-LAFS "promises faultless security", which is an overstatement that...
I don't think this was done. Zooko, is it still important?
> I think we long ago fixed [the ~3GB immutable file limit] by deploying the cloud backend. I see that https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1991 hasn't been closed yet, and I'm not sure why...
Thanks for collating these @zookoatleastauthoritycom .
Let's investigate this further for this milestone, even if we're not able to fix it.
There may still be servers running old versions of Tahoe-LAFS, so this could still be an issue.
This ticket is for browser testing in general, not for the specific issue reported by Jean Lorchat, which is #215.
Actually now that I check, the current version of the Overview of Security Processes doc says this instead: > Amazon S3 is designed to provide 99.999999999% durability and 99.99% availability...
(05:31:43) myers: Do you need to update the .tahoe backup every time you use it? (05:32:09) myers: so I do a backup every night, I'll have new caps to save?...
Is this issue obsolete given the move to `shardtree`?