Vadim Senderovich
Vadim Senderovich
@wilsonsilva thanks for reporting. This number is also parsed as invalid in original libphonenumber. You can check it [here](https://rawgit.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/master/javascript/i18n/phonenumbers/demo-compiled.html) and [open an issue for them](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/new?component=192347&template=829703). Gem's data is based on...
In latest version "442511234" is not valid, but I will keep this as enhancement to expect for e164 only in validator for certain params. Thanks for reporting
@dondanidang-uniq According to regex prefixes 50, 51, 52, 53, 58, 59 will be possible. You can check the original lib [here](https://rawgit.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/master/javascript/i18n/phonenumbers/demo-compiled.html) and [open an issue for them](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/new?component=192347&template=829703). However this is...
@AdamJacobson this gem's data is based on google libphonenumber and it has "1" as country code since it is required for proper parsing, I will try to find a way...
@Shonyyyyy number 491511234567 is not valid by google's regex, their regex says that there should be 8 symbols after 151. ```ruby Phonelib.parse('49 151 12345678').international # => "+49 1511 2345678" ```...
@krtschmr As I saw they are not accepting wiki as official data source, they require links to some authoritative source. Note that prefix ```015xx``` is written with 2 ```x``` while...
@yogesh-stripe @jg-stripe @tanelsuurhans @usama520 This number is also parsed as invalid in original libphonenumber. You can check it [here](https://rawgit.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/master/javascript/i18n/phonenumbers/demo-compiled.html) and [open an issue for them](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/new?component=192347&template=829703). Gem's data is based on...
@rafamelo12 This number is also parsed as invalid in original libphonenumber. You can check it [here](https://rawgit.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/master/javascript/i18n/phonenumbers/demo-compiled.html) and [open an issue for them](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/new?component=192347&template=829703). Gem's data is based on it.
@chiefjuss number 9112345678 is not valid by google's regex. ```ruby Phonelib.parse('+9112345678').valid? # => false ``` Since number is not valid, for countries with option to have double country prefix, library...
@nikhilrivet MCC is not a problem, it's publicly available, but MNC is problematic. I don't have an updated list of MNC phone prefixes. I will try to match MNC against...